|
This page has been created for the one or two friends of mine who once
complained that I never have any personal information on my web pages.
This was put together very quickly. There are spelling and typing mistakes in there. Also,
some of the comments may suffer from my poor memory. I will try and fix things up over
time.
These are, of course, only my personal views. Other people may well differ. That's life!
Mainly fantasy and science fiction. This is just a list of my favourite books, with some
comments. There are many more books that I have read and enjoyed that did not make this
list.
- Rats and Gargoyles by Mary Gentle
-
A "must read". Set in a somewhat gothic, slightly surreal world. Very
magical and mysterious. It is not run-of-the-mill stuff, and I strongly
recommend it. Gentle has written other books and short stories set in the
same / paralell world, but they are not as good. Left to his own
devices is interesting as it places the same characters into a
"modern" (actually slightly in the future) setting, and I've always
wondered how one would translate "magic" into technology; however
the story is not a patch on Rats. I understand that there are two editions
of Rats - and I think I read the earlier edition. I have heard that the later
edition is not as good.
- The Black Company by Glen Cook
-
An excellent series of books, starting with The Black Company. So
far it has not become stale, as many book series do. It tells the story of
a company of mercenary soldiers, again set in a magical world. It is good
because it depicts "Good" and "Evil" on a sliding / grey
scale: more like what you normally experience. There is no ultimate Evil as
in Lord of the Rings (below), for example. Ingenuity and grit
are used to overcome powerful sorcery. The characters and situations are very
down-to-earth compared to most fantasy; the main characters tend not to be
superhuman heroes, and battles are dirty and unpleasant.
- Discworld series by Terry Pratchett
-
Very funny and light hearted. Yet more fantasy books, however it draws
inspiration from the "real" world. In fact I would say it pretty
much paralells the real world, and depicts it how it really sould be. I have
often suspected that you have to be a particular type of person to enjoy
the books, and also that the humour is somewhat English. However, the books
appear to have a very broad appeal - which just shows you that my gut
instincts can be wrong sometimes! The latest in the series was not as good
as some of the proceeding books in my opinion, but is still within the range
of the series as a whole: so I would not say it is going stale yet. The first
book was The Colour of Magic, but most of the books can be read
out of sequence.
- Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkien
-
This is the original great quest to bring down the Evil Lord. Some
"originals" are not particularly good, however this is as good
as anything else I've come across in terms of "high fantasy&qout; (i.e.
magic, dwarves, elves, goblins, etc). In that light, I find that most high
fantasy seems like an immitation. I admit that I am not a big fan of high
fantasy, preferring the sort of stuff above. However, you really should
read Lord of the Rings. I suggest reading The Hobbit
first. This is a shorter book and easier to read. The story is essentially
a prologue to LotR. Tolkein really does a good job of providing a history and
setting for his story.
- Bad Voltage by Jonathan Littell
-
Do not read Neuromancer by William Gibson as your first
"cyberpunk" genre story - read Bad Voltage instead!
It really is a much better tale, with more emphasis on the story and less
on the technology - I normally find science fiction with too much emphasis
on technology to be unpalatable as the technology is treated so badly. The
technology is treated a little differently from Gibson's treatment (no AI's,
no real "jacking in"). This book does get somewhat gruesome and
visceral in places - so you have been warned. It is, in fact, set in Paris, which
is a nice change from the usual settings.
- "Snow Crash" and "The Diamond Age" by Neal Stephenson
-
Snow Crash is a cyberpunk novel with all the computers and
virtual reality you'd expect. However it has a really good sense of humour,
which is very much in evidence at the start of the book. As you read further
the whackyness gets less evident (or you get used to it), and an element of
mysticism takes over. An excellent tale. The Diamond Age is set
in Eric Drexler's dream world! Well, maybe not quite, but the setting is in
a future where molecular nanotechnology rules. Once again, the story outweighs
any qualms I may have about the technology, although it gets a bit too much
towards the end. A fascinating world is depicted - very different from anything
else. Both books have very refreshing and original settings / feel.
- The Eden trilogy by Harry Harrison
-
Three books (naturally): West of Eden, Winter in Eden, and
Return to Eden. Once again, an original setting. In this
trilogy the dionsaurs never became extinct and an intelligent species
became the dominant life-form, with only a small part of the world
occupied by man. The real interesting aspect is that the dinosaurs effectively
developed biotechnology as opposed to the technologies you see around you, and
live much more harmoniously with their enviroment (supposedly). No matter
what problems you have with the science, the world depicted certainly gives
you pause to think. I feel that Harrison's early works were generally the
best, and many more recent works tend to get published because of the name
he made for himself in the early days; this does not mean that all his recent
works are bad, but careful selection is advised.
- Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep ? by Philip K Dick
-
The book that the film Bladerunner (below) was based on. The
book and the film are not the same (just similar)! I guess that the message
is similar, and the setting is definately very familiar. If you have seen the
film, it is still worth reading the book.
- The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho
-
Subtitled: A fable about following your dream, which pretty much
describes the book. This book has been massively over-hyped. I've included it
for several reasons. Firstly to show that I read something other then fantasy
and science fiction. But also because it is a nice little story, very
heart-warming, and I enjoyed it. Just do not expect it to live up to the hype.
- Candide by Voltaire
-
I've been reading some "classics" recently, because they are cheap and
because I feel I should try and get some culture! Candide surprised me: it is
very tongue-in-cheek, and absolutely hilarious. Apparently, Voltaire wote it
to destroy the idea that this is "the best of all possible worlds" -
which he does in an exceedingly amusing manner!
A.K.A Movies in some parts of the world. In no particular order.
- Bladerunner
-
Probably the original cyberpunk film ? (What about Metropolis ?).
Set in a
future where everyone who can lives off Earth, and the only real way to tell
humans from androids is by a bone-marrow test (or maybe the empathy tests still
work). The world depicted is fascinating, and the story beats out the bad science
(there is more technology in the book, above, but the story still carries it
for me). The basic question (message) of both the film and the book (Do
Androids Dream of Electric Sheep ?) is how to draw the dividing
line between human and non-human: one of those nice grey questions that I like
to watch people struggle with. This combines with the setting, the story, and
the effects to make an excellent film.
- BRAZIL (Terry Gilliam's film)
-
More cyberpunk. To me this is 1984 with a little Dilbert (see the cartoon below)
thrown in. It conveys the oppression and hopelessness you would associate
with 1984, along with the humour you'd expect from Gilliam: you just know
that the burocratic world will always remain chaotic! I feel that the ending is
a bit out of place, but it does appeal to me. I very much like Gilliam's style.
Time Bandits is another favourite of mine.
- Star Wars
-
(The trilogy). I am old enough to remember seeing this when it was first in the
cinema. I also went specially to see the re-release. To date, I have found the
prequels to be disappointing inb comparison (I have read the books of the last
three stories in the series, and they seem to be better than the prequels if
my memory holds up). I guess it was inevitable that I would like Star
Wars: science & technology with magic and mysticism thrown in. I
find it very easy to get absorbed into the universe depicted, and the new
effects definately make it worth seeing again (and maybe again...).
- Hawk the Slayer
-
This is a fantasy film with all the ingredients you need: a dwarf, an elf,
an ogre, a prince and his evil brother, etc, even a blind old woman! It does
take itself too seriously, either, which makes it very enjoyable. See it
because it is what a fantasy film should be.
- Soylent Green
-
Based on the short story Make Room, Make Room! by Harry Harrison.
Yet another set in a future where the planet's resources are about to run out.
I suspect it has lost much of its original impact over the years, but still
a film you should see at least once.
- Lord of The Rings (the Film trilogy)
-
Huge amounts of hype! Well, they did a good job of this, generally speaking.
It does diverge from the book, but mainly for good film making reasons. (For
instance, at the start of the book Gandalf just vanishes and we don't know what's
happened, which adds greatly to the tension; the film shows this in parallel
with the hobbits' adventures to avoid a long flashback sequence). What really annoys
me is that they messed up the ending. There is no point in having such a long ending
if you do not show what the book shows: that the shire has been harmed and
industry has arrived (the coming age of men is now here!). I would also have
liked to see Saruman's last stand in the tower, which was cut from the film.
My musical tastes are generally varied. I like a lot of modern pop, and back to the '60's.
Some of the modern dance music is not to my taste, as is much of the more extreme stuff
(Thrash, most / early Punk, for example). I do not listen to classical by choice - but
I'm not sure why; I should probably broaden my horizons. My tape collection is, however,
very limited, and I guess you'd characterise my tastes by that.
The collection is mainly what is classified as "new age" music, but I would
consider that label to be misleading. It has a lot of "Tangerine Dream", and
also includes "Jean Michel Jarre", "Mike Oldfield", "Enya",
and "Yanni". I also have tapes with other types of music in there, but
generally only one or two of each.
Generally, I cannot get enthusiastic enough about music to recommend anything particular
to anyone. If I was going to do so, it would have to be the work of Mark Shreeve. Since no
one seems to have heard of Mark Shreeve, and his music is hard to get hold of, try this
link:
Redshreeve: Mark Shreeve, Redshift, Arc
which has some MP3 samples. The material I really like, and possibly
Mark's lasting legacy to the EM scene, can be found on the Legion and
Crash Head albums. Nocturne is more recent and similar in
terms of material, and Collide is an excellent live album. (As usual,
I have no idea how long that link is likely to be active). Embryo (his
first album) is very much like early Tangerine Dream, and Assassin is
similar to later TD. It's with Legion that Mark really comes into his own.
His other projects, Redshift and Arc, are more ambient and use a lot of analogue synths.
I may start collecting these because I really like the way he layers the music.
It is safe to say that I am not a sporty person.
I do archery. I my main bow is a 60lb+ English longbow, which I shoot regularly (I also have two spares; a longbow is nine tenths broken, as they say). I have managed to find a field archery
club on a bus route. Assuming most people don't know what field archery is:
it is like golf, but with bows and arrows in woods / rough terrain. You shoot at cardboard
cut-outs, or rubber models (if you're lucky). Unlike target archery, you are not told
the distance, and every arrow you shoot is almost always at a different distance from
the previous arrow. Archery is probably more of a mental sport than a physical sport,
requiring considerable concentration and practice to become good; it is also very
relaxing in this respect.
I also have a 30lb recurve which I may shoot from time-to-time with sight: just to
show people that I can sometimes hit gold!
Dilbert. This is what life as an engineer is like!
I do not know how he Scott Adams keeps coming up with this stuff - I guess there is
no end to incompetence. Read it daily.
|